James Beaven vs Patrick Foley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In second serve points, Foley has a slight edge, winning 46.15% compared to Beaven's 42.74% in recent performance. Could this impact the match outcome? It's highly probable.
• When it comes to return games, Foley has a stronger recent form, winning 50% of opponents' second serve points versus Beaven's 40.87%.
• On first serve returns, Foley again outperforms Beaven, capturing 29.27% compared to Beaven's 27.05%.
• Under pressure, Beaven excels in saving breakpoints, with a rate of 51.67%, while Foley has saved 44.68%.
• Recent performance shows Beaven with higher overall match success, boasting a 60.98% win rate over the last year, compared to Foley's 50%.
• Both players show their best performance on hard surfaces; Beaven edges ahead with a 48% win rate on Hard, versus Foley's 43%.
• In terms of playing level, both have similar experience predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, yet Beaven posts better win stats.
• Foley has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 144.41, whereas Beaven's opponents have averaged a rank of 206.76.
• With both players winning 33% of deciding sets, neither displays a strong advantage in these high-pressure situations.
• When it comes to breakpoint conversion, Beaven leads slightly, converting 29.03% compared to Foley's 25.53%.
• Ultimately, Beaven's better win rate, combined with superior breakpoint conversions, suggests a slight overall advantage over Foley.

Editorial Prediction (August 3, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent second serve performance, Foley shows a slight edge, potentially impacting the match outcome given the high correlation with match prediction accuracy. Foley also showcases prowess in return games, particularly on opponents' second serves.

Despite this, the ability under pressure paints a different picture. Beaven holds a higher breakpoint save rate, an essential factor during crucial match moments. Additionally, Beaven's superior breakpoint conversion further solidifies their competitive edge.

Over the last year, Beaven's win percentage surpasses Foley's, reflecting consistent performance across matches played, especially on hard courts where both have their best surface record. Furthermore, Beaven's experience, albeit against lower-ranked players, accounts for a stronger winning record.

Based on the comparative analysis of strengths in breakpoint scenarios, overall match success, and similar surface proficiency, Beaven is tipped as the favorite to win the upcoming match against Foley.